There’s a lot of talk lately about dogs’ intelligence. Some researchers compare dogs’ intelligence to that of a 2-year-old child. I don’t think that makes sense. First of all, an intelligent 2-year-old grows up to be an intelligent adult, a less-intelligent 2-year-old grows up to be a less intelligent adult so, really, what IS the intelligence of a 2-year old? It varies as widely as the intelligence of people at any age.
But the real problem with the comparison is, I think, that human intelligence and dog intelligence are very different. A 2-year-old child is human and is learning to function in a human world. Human children are born preprogrammed for language and other things that equip them for life among humans.
A dog is, well, a dog (please, somebody, explain this to Jana — I have not been able to convince her of this fact yet!). Dogs are born preprogrammed to exist in a dog world. And the world of a domestic dog is weird — it is, of necessity, intertwined with the human world. We’ve played with their genetics so much that the domestic dog cannot function as a wild animal. Yet dogs retain some behaviors that are directly traceable to their wild ancestors. Their communication system — chiefly body language — mimics that of wild canines. Their vocalizations, their play style, their prey drive, and so much more. But in designing breeds and through the long process of domestication, much of this behavior has changed. Dogs have adapted to our world.
I think intelligence is figuring out how to not merely survive but to thrive in one’s environment. For a human 2-year-old, that is a human environment. For a dog, that is also a human environment — so not only must the dog learn dog stuff, the dog also has to learn to understand and make himself understood by members of another species. Much more difficult.
Think of it another way. People who use guide dogs put their lives and safety into the dog’s paws. How many of you would trust a 2-year-old, even a very bright one, to decide when it is safe for you to cross the street? How many 2-year-olds can understand sheep herding or search-and-rescue?
Dogs have mastered our world and learned to manipulate us (OK, many 2-year-olds are great manipulators too) and they’ve learned to partner us in dozens of ways that go far, far beyond the capabilities of any 2-year-old. It’s a very different sort of intelligence and, I argue, can’t be described or defined by comparison with humans’ intelligence at any age.
What do you think?

I often tell people whose dogs I am training that their dogs are smarter than they think and are capable of a lot more than we give them credit for. I am well aware that most people vastly underestimate their dogs. I guess I am “most people” since Jana kindly keeps proving to me that she’s far brighter than I recognize. Wylie, too. In just the last couple of days they each gave us an example that had us shaking our heads and chiding ourselves for, yet again, underestimating them.

Jana first. When she’s done eating, she picks up her bowl and hands it to me. If I am not in the room with her, she comes to find me, carrying the bowl in her mouth. She’ll happily pick up Wylie’s bowl too, and the bowls of any guest-dog-diners as well. She has learned well the lesson that “she who picks up the bowls, gets the cookies.” Well, a few days ago, she and Wylie had finished eating and Deni and I were in another room. Deni heard some banging and looked over to see what was going on. She called me over and said, “You’ve got to see this! Jana’s stacking the bowls!”
Sure enough, Jana was trying to put one bowl inside the other. Unfortunately, she had the bigger bowl on top so it wasn’t working too well, but she certainly had the right idea! Now, when she brings me the bowls, I ask her to get the “bigger” one first (remember that lesson?) and then I ask her to put the smaller one inside the bigger one. She does it precisely and neatly every time. With some practice, I am sure she’ll figure out how to stack them and then bring me both together.

Now Wylie. We have several soft wool balls that we put in the dryer with our laundry. They are supposed to prevent static cling. To dogs, they look like really great toys. Yesterday, as Deni was folding laundry, a wool ball fell to the floor. Wylie picked it up. Deni asked him to “bring the ball back.” He looked at her for a moment, then walked over to the toy basket. He dropped the new, very desirable wool ball into the toy basket and picked up a less desirable alternative — a small basketball that is losing air due to an unfortunate encounter with a Wylie-tooth. Wylie carried the basketball to Deni and offered it to her. He knew he had taken a ball and had to give Deni a ball; he did not offer any of the dozens of non-ball toys that are in the basket. He clearly understood that a ball was needed but he wasn’t quite ready to part with the new, nice ball so he offered a different one in exchange, figuring, I think, that since we humans don’t appreciate balls nearly as much as he does, Deni wouldn’t mind. Nice try, Wylie!

I went to see a herding dog trial this week. My friend Tom had his dogs entered in the trial and it sounded like fun. It WAS fun. We saw Tom’s dog Ki work with cattle and ducks. I’ve seen him herd sheep as well. Watching Ki and the other dogs was interesting for many reasons.
First of all, herding uncooperative livestock demands coordination and strategizing. When dog and human work on herding together, they have to share not only the ultimate goal but the plan for how to achieve it. This tells me that not only is the dog thinking, but the dog and human are clearly communicating. Some scientists (and others) believe that thinking is not possible without spoken language and that true communication only occurs when spoken language is possible. This is a convenient way to form a foundation for the claim that only humans can think and communicate on a high level. How absurd.
Watching working dogs also reinforces my deeply held belief that dogs need jobs. I am sure that there are some individuals, just as there are individual humans, who are content to lie around all day on a soft bed and do nothing, but most dogs — as most people — are bright and curious and want to be more engaged with the world than that. A dog’s job can be simple — bringing in the morning paper and cleaning up his toys at night, for example. It can be complex — guide dogs come to mind, or search and rescue dogs, or the many working dogs on farms all over the world. As with people, dogs have different aptitudes and preferences. And their circumstances might dictate their job. A dog living in a city is unlikely to have much chance to herd cattle, but he could easily be kept busy — and mentally challenged — in other ways.
Some of the dogs at the trial are herding dogs only for fun — that is, it’s their hobby, a way for them to work and think and spend high quality time with their humans. Others are real working dogs. All of them seemed happy to be there and looked like they were enjoying their work.
Finally, I am convinced that “bad” dogs (anyone see “Marley and Me” ??) are only trying to find ways to put their considerable intelligence, their problem solving skills, and their excess energy to work. Wouldn’t you rather decide how your dog expends his excess energy than let him come up with his own ideas?
Jana and I recently started attending agility classes after a (too) long break. Agility is mentally and physically stimulating for Jana (and for me) and really tires her out. It is also a lot of fun. She is bright, alert, engaged and very happy to be there. It’s not the same as a “job” but it certainly offers her the chance to think things though and offers us a chance to improve our communication and have fun together. Wylie loves it too, but his mom plans to try him out on Flyball since he’s so ball-obsessed. Whatever your dog’s passion, there might be a job or “hobby” out there that is perfect for him or her. Remember, a tired dog is a good dog!

Today is Jana’s 6th birthday. I decided to take a few hours off work and do some fun things with her.

Last night we went to an agility class. She’s taken beginning agility classes and has learned most of the equipment, but she has fun with it. We’re nowhere near ready to run full courses but she really enjoys the classes. She was alert, engaged, and really loved all the treats.

Today, I took her to the river for a swim. I threw sticks in for her to swim after. She doesn’t really retrieve them, not fully believing that she’s a retriever (or even a dog, for that matter). She swam, rolled in the grass, swam some more.

Then we went to the Dairy Queen for a treat. I got ice cream. Then I asked for a plain hot dog, no bun. “Nothing, no bun?” the Dairy Queen lady asked. “Well, it’s for my dog. It’s her birthday and I promised her a treat,” I answered. “Oh, for your dog. Does she want it in a little baggie?” The woman smiled at me, then frowned at the cash register, wondering how much to charge. She only charged me 50 cents. Then she asked, “Does she want a doggy cone for dessert?” “You DO that?” I asked. Yes they do. Dairy Queen lady pulled out a tiny little cone — maybe 2 inches tall — and filled it with Dairy Queen ice cream, a little glob on top, just like a grown-up cone. Only tiny.
I got into the car and told Jana she was the luckiest dog in the world. I showed her the hot dog. Her eyes got really big. I gave her bites of hot dog. Then, I offered the cone. Her eyes lit up and got even bigger. She bit off the top glob of ice cream and then — very daintily — licked the ice cream down to the cone and nibbled at the cone. Finally, she gobbled the cone. Then she started eyeing mine…
Now she’s sunbathing in the yard.

A couple of years ago, on Jana’s birthday, we were driving from Richmond, VA to Jefferson, MA, where we lived at the time. It was a very long day in the car. At one of our stops, I got myself some ice cream, then got Jana a small bowl of vanilla. When I got her out of the car and offered it to her, she was absolutely incredulous. She looked at it, then looked at me, back at it, and back at me, as if to ask, “For ME?? Really??!!” I said, yes, for you, and she eagerly and happily started slurping away.

So. When’s the last time you did something nice for your dog? For many people, living with a dog is all about what the dog does for them. We should all take a look at the world from our dog’s point of view sometimes. Figure out what her favorite activity is, her favorite toy or food or color (Jana’s is pink). Our relationships with our dogs add so much to our lives. I like thinking of ways to make Jana really happy so she knows how much I appreciate having her in my life. Happy Birthday, Jana!

Jana and I have been working on concept learning. A while ago, I taught her “in,” “on,” and “under.” I would ask her to put a ball or toy in a basket, on the table, under the table, etc. We use these concepts for tasks like putting trash in the trash basket, placing the newspaper on the coffee table, and putting her toys back in the toy basket when playtime ends.

Next, I decided to teach Jana the relative concepts of “bigger” and “smaller.” I got three pairs of items that are identical except for their size (tennis balls, rope toys and measuring cups). The first two sessions, we only looked for the “bigger” item. Then only the “smaller” item. Then we mixed it up. She was getting the correct item about three-quarters of the time. Better than chance but with room to improve.

Then something interesting happened. Jana selected the requested item but, instead of giving it to me, she gave me her “LOOK” and walked over to the nearest basket (the office trash can) and dropped it in. She did this a couple of times. I finally caught on and instead of just asking for the item, I’d say, “Get the bigger one and put it in the basket;” or “Get the smaller one and put it on the table.”

Clearly, Jana wanted the game to be different. Was she bored and asking for a higher-level game? Was she just giving me a hard time? Did she want to stop playing this game? I’ll never know her true motivation. I do think that she had more fun with the new, improved game. Maybe because it was more interesting, maybe because she contributed to making the rules, maybe both. The challenge is to keep coming up with new ways to challenge this too-smart dog!

Jana and I are new to blogging, so bear with us please!
Jana is the inspiration behind The Thinking Dog. I have learned so much from working with and observing her.

Visit often for updates and news from Jana and me.